main
  about us
  news
  topics
  author
  euroletter
  news from other sites
  links
 
 
 Libertarian Theory
  General
  Anarchism
  Capitalism
  Democracy
  Minarchism
  Nationalism
  Rights
  Socialism/Communism
 Economy
  General
  Austrian School
  Business Cycles
  Gold Standard
  Inflation
 Education
  General
  Private education
 Environment
  General
  Climate
  Energy
  Greenhouse effects
  "Greens"
 Government
  General
 Health
  General
  Abortion, Euthanasia, Suicide
  Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs
  Cloning
  Cryogen suspension
  Food and Medicine /Right to choose your own
  Regulation
  Health Care
 Individuals
  General
 International Relations
  General
  Development Help
  Europe and EU /Uniting Europe without the Union
  Globalising
  Migration
  Secession Right
  War on Terrorism
 Interviews
  General
 Miscellaneous
  General
 Politics
  General
 Previews
  General
 Rights
  General
  Gun Rights
  Human Rights /Emancipation
  Property Rights
  Self Defence
  Speech Freedom
  Values and Norms
 Rights, Justice
  General
  Punishment and restitution
  Punishment
  Security
  War on Drugs
 Taxes
  General
  Taxes
  Social security
  Subsidies
 Communication
  General
  Censoring
  Internet Freedom
  Privacy and Encryption
 Religion
  General
  Islam
  Internet
  Investment
  War
  Politicians
  Redistribution
  Waste
  Police
 Repression and Police State
  General
  Database State
  Torture
 Activism
  General
  Conservatism
  Unclassified
 
Today: Tue, July 28 2015  -  Last modified: April, 26 2007
 Rights
22 June 2015
 
 
Looking Back at Magna Carta
by Sheldon Richman
 sub-topic» General

All further opposition, therefore, became impracticable. At Runnemede, a large meadow between Windsor and Staines; a place which has been rendered immortal in the page of the historian and in the song of the poet; was held that famous conference, when the barons presented, in writing, the articles of agreement upon which they insisted; and the king gave an explicit consent to their demands. The articles were then reduced into the form of a charter; to which the king affixed his great seal; and which, though it was of the same nature with the charters obtained from the preceding monarchs, yet, as it was obtained with difficulties which created more attention, and as it is extended to a greater variety of particulars, has been called, by way of distinction, the great charter of our liberties.

 more» 
16 May 2015
 
 
We are ready. And you know that we are too
by Liberty
 sub-topic» General

In short: we already have a Bill of Rights. It's called the Human Rights Act. Scrapping it will diminish the rights of everyone in the UK, and the most vulnerable will suffer most. It's our Human Rights Act, and we will do everything in our power to save it from repeal.

Thank you for your support. Together we can save our Human Rights Act.

 more» 
04 April 2015
 
 
The Right to Discriminate Against Ellen Pao
by Jacob G. Hornberger
 sub-topic» General

Indeed, how can people in society truly be considered free if theyíre not free to associate with whomever they wish to associate? And doesnít the fundamental right of freedom of association necessarily entail freedom of non-association?

If Jane doesnít approve of Johnís hiring practices, she is free to decline to buy whatever his new business is selling. She also has the right to publicize Johnís hiring practices and to persuade other people to boycott Johnís business.

But Jane has no moral right to force John to hire her or anyone else. Thatís because itís his money and his business, not hers. Private property and individual freedom necessarily entail a right to run oneís business any way one wants

 more» 
09 March 2013
 
 
Dark days for rights as attacks gather pace
by Corinna Lotz
 sub-topic» General

Last night MPs voted against ďsafeguardsĒ to curb the use of secret courts proposed in the Bill. Labourís amendments were intended to make it more palatable to its numerous critics. But with the unstinting help of former Labour ministers David Blunkett, Jack Straw and Hazel Blears, the amendments failed by 71 and 73 votes, even though seven Lib Dems rebelled.

 more»