However, there’s a fundamental flaw in that reasoning. The right to spend one’s money as he sees fit is as fundamental and inherent a right as freedom of travel. After all, it’s your money, isn’t it? Why shouldn’t you be free to do whatever you want with it, including traveling wherever you wish and spending or investing it the way you want? Under what legitimate authority does a servant dictate to a master what he can and cannot do with his own money?